Search results

I second this. I’m in Florida. Our EV6 gets around 3 mi/kwh on short (less than 2 mile) trips in the summer mostly because we blast the AC for a few minutes before leaving and while the kid gets buckled in. Longer trips in the city we get at least 4 in the summer, closer to 4.5 in the winter...

Everything about that rendering looks good except the front end and headlights.

One of my questions has been what happens to the aero when a bunch of boxes are in the bed. If you keep them below the bed line will it be much of an impact. An aerodynamic bed cover might be something like the fastback F150 cover that came out a few years back.

Please 16-17” rims with a big sidewall tire. Better for range, cheaper to replace, better for ride comfort, less likely to get damaged.

I’m sure it will be NACS. I find it annoying because I already have a CCS to NACs adapter that was $200 and a J1772 to NACS adapter (because for some reason our ‘23 EV6 came with a 120V NACS charger). My home charger, the free one at my office and the free ones at our city parking garages are...

Agreed. 200 is a little low for standard. 200 in the bare minimum for optics, and I’d expect more like 210-230. 300 on extended range would be a massive disappointment. 280 would be a joke in 2027. Base model 200-300 is fine, but no one should use the words ‘extended range’ with anything less...

I haven’t looked at it that closely, but I think you’re right. The fathom will curve down at the end of the cab, but the spy shots don’t look like it’s that much.

I feel like it would be more impactful to do a truck conquest line. Take my Silverado. It’s my third one and I’m excited to make the switch.