That first photo it doesn't have the front end attached, you can see the sheet falling off basically right after it comes off the windshield. The other pics Pattrick showed I think show the design with the front end on.
It depends on the execution. My area 51 mav is pastel and the color looks stunning in some lighting. Usually with overcast when it develops this really strong tealish look.
I'm getting more and more excited. My only real concerns left are styling and range. I hope it's not hideous, and hope the range is solid. Because the rest of the attributes are looking incredible. The price, performance, tech and features, etc.
That's what I'm saying, you're 68 inches tall, so is Farley, so if this truck was as tall as a maverick, it would be able eye level with him, but it's not.
That suggests it's significantly lower, I'm thinking around 60 inches tall compared to the mavs 68. The vehicle behind him is a fathom...
You're assuming the entry level slate and fathom use the same size battery. What if the entry level fathom uses a smaller battery than slate but gets similar range as a result of better aero?
My inside source is telling me the standard range is 200 miles, the larger pack is 280-300 miles.
Fully loaded, larger battery, AWD, nicest options, it'll be about 40k. We'll see how accurate that is.
The most interesting thing about this is you see how the back of the cab wall is recessed. I've theorized there was a areo piece running off the back and sides of the cab for better aero but recessed to give you more bed space, and this confirms it.
Hey everyone,
Now that we're getting more photos of the truck, I thought it would be fun to have a design analysis thread trying to dissect the design, and make some guesses as to what the truck will look like.
We have the mules to reference, but I'm also focusing on these covered sheet images...